![]()
|
roxanne m carter & braxton soderman | 2006 [ONE] [TWO] [THREE]
The world
is not unexplained since it is told like a story; each one of its accidents is
but a circumstance, and the preterite is precisely this operative sign whereby
the narrator reduces the exploded reality to a slim and pure logos, without
density, without volume, without spread, and whose sole function is to unite as
rapidly as possible a cause and an end. When the historian states that the duc
de Guise died on December 23rd, 1588, or when the novelist relates that the
Marchioness went out at five o'clock, such actions emerge from a past without
substance; purged of the uncertainty of existence, they are a recollection, but
a useful recollection, the interest of which far surpasses its duration.
So that
finally the preterite is the expression of an order, and consequently of a
euphoria. Thanks to it, reality is neither mysterious nor absurd; it is clear,
almost familiar, repeatedly gathered up and contained in the hand of the
creator; it is subjected to the ingenious pressure of his freedom. [...] He who tells the story has the power to do
away with the opacity and the solitude of the existences which made it up, since
he can in all sentances bear witness to a communication and a hierarchy of actions and since, to tell the truth, these
very actions can be reduced to mere signs.
- Roland Barthes, Writing Degree Zero
|
![]()
|